פסקי דין #תביעת לשון הרע

Summary: Attorney Zion Bahloul successfully represents a client who was assaulted by security guards at the "Pussycat" club. The article describes how Attorney Zion Bahloul achieved a successful legal outcome for a client who was attacked by security guards at the "Pussycat" strip club. Despite the negative reputation of the club owners and their image as "tough guys," Attorney Bahloul did not shy away from the challenge and fought resolutely for the client. Despite the club's attempts to disavow responsibility, Attorney Bahloul conducted a thorough investigation that revealed a pattern of improper behavior, and the evidence gathered forced the owners to compromise and compensate the client. The article emphasizes the firm's commitment to justice and its willingness to face any challenge on behalf of its clients.

Request to remove security cameras from the walls of a condominium - In this regard, the Honorable Court is requested to make use of the authority granted to it and issue temporary injunctions pending a decision in the main case titled as follows: A. An order that will require Respondents 1 and 2, or someone on their behalf, to remove 6 illegal surveillance cameras that were installed by one of them inside/on the building at 7 Menachem Begin Street, Tel Aviv, known as Block 7443, Lot 5 (hereinafter: "the Building"), all as detailed below. B. An order that will prohibit Respondents 1 and 2, or someone on their behalf, from installing additional cameras throughout the building that overlook common areas in the building.

תביעה שהוגשה כנגד חבר נציגות ועד דיירים בבניין היוקרה "סיטי טאוור" בר"ג על שבמשך זמן ממושך העליל על דייר בעל נכסים בבניין כי התנהל באופן פלילי בבניין, לאחר הליכי הוכחות שהתנהל בניצוחו של עו"ד ציון בהלול הובן ללא ספק כי התנהלותו של הנתבע הייתה בגדר לשון הרע , בית המשפט פסק לפי סעיף 79א פיצוי ע"ס של 70,000 ש"ח

After an investigation of several witnesses and the presentation of evidence, the prosecution, led by Attorney Zion Bahul, dismissed a lawsuit on the pretext of a violation of privacy, for which compensation of NIS 362,000 was demanded from the defendants. After the investigation, the court recommended that the plaintiffs reach an agreement before concluding that their lawsuit would be dismissed. The lawsuit was dismissed on the court's recommendation.

Clients who came to our office after an enforcement case was opened against them for a judgment given two years earlier requested to follow up on the case of the court of appeal, after it became clear that the judgment was given without defense, even though they had received the statement of claim. Our office was able to cancel the judgment and subsequently cancel the enforcement case. A ground for canceling a judgment can be for two reasons - due to the duty of justice and/or for reasons of court consideration. In the case before us, the judgment was canceled following defense claims that the clients had and for reasons of court consideration.

The firm's client, who was required to pay the accountant astronomical amounts after she requested to leave his services without owing him anything, was denied all accounting material - following a quick lawsuit in the opening motion that included a temporary relief to return the material - the court granted the lawsuit filed through Attorney Zion Bahul and the material was returned.